Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani escalated her war against President Donald Trump’s election-integrity agenda Tuesday, declaring that the U.S. Postal Service violated her nationwide injunction by completing new security regulations for federal mail-in ballots.
Just one day after the United States Supreme Court UPHELD, for now, President Trump’s executive order and the new U.S. Postal Service rules designed to secure America’s mail-in ballots, this Obama-appointed radical in Boston just ruled that Trump’s Postal Service has VIOLATED her earlier injunction.
She’s going off. Aggressively. Accusing the Trump team of “complete noncompliance.”
This is pure judicial warfare against the American people and against free and fair elections.
Talwani’s nationwide injunction (entered earlier this month in League of Women Voters of Massachusetts v. Trump) explicitly barred the USPS Defendants “from implementing, giving effect to, or enforcing Section 3 of Executive Order No. 14399… or otherwise initiating or completing rulemaking to promulgate the specific regulations outlined in Section 3(b)(i)-(v) or (d) of the EO for the November 3, 2026 or any earlier election.”
On Friday evening, August 21, the USPS completed the rulemaking process. They sent a Final Rule titled “Ballot Mail for Federal Elections” to the Office of the Federal Register, with an immediate effective date of August 21 and publication set for August 26.
The Final Rule itself nods to the injunctions and states the Postal Service “will not take actions to implement the rule specifically for the 2026 election unless and until the government obtains relief from those injunctions.”
Not good enough for Judge Talwani.
She blasted the defendants for ignoring her “explicit directive not to ‘initiat[e] or complet[e]’ rulemaking.” She even accused the administration of having “feigned complete compliance” with her earlier related injunction in the California v. Trump case when they went to the Supreme Court seeking emergency relief.
“Accordingly, despite the Defendants’ protestations that ‘[t]he United States takes its obligation to comply with court orders very seriously,’ the court finds that Defendants violated the preliminary injunction in this case.”
This comes one day after the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay of Talwani’s other injunction in the California case (Trump v. California, No. 26A124), allowing the administration to move forward on key portions of the EO for now.
Talwani is going full activist. She’s calling out “complete noncompliance” even as the Final Rule makes crystal clear it won’t be enforced for the 2026 election until the injunctions are lifted. And then… she imposes no remedy.
No order striking the Final Rule. No further restrictions. Just “identifying the violation.” She even agreed with the defendants that the plaintiffs’ requested relief “does not change the current landscape.”
Classic.
🚨 Judge Indira Talwani ruled that the USPS violated her nationwide injunction against President Trump’s election executive order by finalizing mail-ballot rules while the order was blocked, accusing the government of having “feigned complete compliance.” pic.twitter.com/m0VcozdCkM
— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) August 25, 2026
As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, the high court stayed an injunction in the related Trump v. California litigation.
The Supreme Court determined that the Trump administration was likely to prevail on its argument that the coalition of Democrat-led states lacked standing and that their claims were not ripe for judicial review.
The majority also found that the lower court’s injunction was inflicting irreparable harm on the federal government by preventing USPS from even initiating the rulemaking requested by the president.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.
The final USPS regulations require federal ballot-mail envelopes to carry official Election Mail markings, satisfy automation standards, and include unique Intelligent Mail barcodes.
State election officials would submit voter information through a Federal Ballot Mail Portal, including:
- The name of the person receiving the ballot
- The voter’s address
- A unique barcode for the outbound ballot envelope
- A unique barcode for the return envelope
- The state of the originating election office
Outgoing federal ballot mail that fails to satisfy the standards could be rejected and returned to the authorized election official for correction.
The Postal Service said the regulations were designed to improve ballot tracking, reduce fraud risks, and help ensure that the right ballots are transmitted to the right eligible voters.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, USPS moved ahead with finalizing the safeguards while agreeing that they would not be activated for the November election unless the outstanding injunctions were lifted.
The Gateway Pundit also previously reported on Talwani’s August 11 decision expanding her block nationwide.
Then, over the weekend, Talwani ordered the Trump administration to defend the regulations by 8 a.m. Tuesday—nearly 16 hours earlier than the left-wing plaintiffs themselves requested.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, Talwani blamed USPS for the compressed schedule and declared that the agency had “created the emergency.”
The Trump administration has filed an emergency motion asking Talwani to reconsider her injunction or stay it while the government appeals. Talwani said she would address that request in a separate order.
The Supreme Court has already removed one judicial roadblock standing in the way of Trump’s mail-ballot safeguards.
Ad block users: Some site features may not work correctly while an ad blocker is enabled, because they break scripts and content this website depends on. If you can’t see comments below, for example, please disable your ad blocker.
Read the full article here