Michigan Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson- campaigning for Michigan Governor

On August 12, The Gateway Pundit’s Patty McMurray reported that Michigan attorney Kevin Kijewski filed a verified complaint in the Michigan Court of Claims on behalf of Bridgewater Township Clerk Michelle McQueer.

Kijewski, a former Republican candidate for Michigan Attorney General, first gained statewide attention for successfully defending Clifford Frost, one of the Republican alternate electors targeted by Attorney General Dana Nessel. After securing the dismissal of the charges against Frost, Kijewski was inspired to seek the AG nomination, running on a platform to end partisan lawfare and restore the rule of law.

Here is a screenshot of Michelle McQueer’s lawsuit against Jocelyn Benson.

Kevin Kijewski lawsuit-representing Plaintiff MI Clerk Michelle McQueer

The lawsuit challenged Rule R 168.48, issued under Benson’s authority, which requires clerks to delete electronic poll book software and all associated files within seven days after an election is certified.

Could Benson’s requirement to willfully destroy election documents in advance of the 22-month federal and state preservation statute put clerks in jeopardy of being criminally charged?

Federal law states:

-52 U.S.C. § 20701 requires every “officer of election” to retain and preserve all records relating to voting in federal elections for 22 months.

-52 U.S.C. § 20702 makes it a federal crime for any person to willfully destroy, conceal, or alter those records.
Penalty: up to a $1,000 fine, up to one year in prison, or both.

The complaint argues the rule collides with federal statute (52 U.S.C. § 20701), which requires election officers to preserve all records relating to acts of voting in federal elections for 22 months. Willful destruction of those records is a federal crime. Michigan law (MCL 168.811) similarly prohibits the destruction of election returns, poll lists, and federal-office ballots before the same 22-month period expires.

McQueer lawsuit argues Michigan Sec of State Jocelyn Benson is asking them to delete election records in advance of the 22-month federal requirement, making them potentially liable for criminal charges.

McQueer contended the electronic poll books contain unique, detailed data — including activity logs, timestamps, ballot transactions, and operator actions — that are not fully preserved in printed reports or the Qualified Voter File. Once deleted, that information is gone. She asked the court to declare the seven-day deletion rule invalid or unenforceable where it conflicts with the longer retention requirements, and to issue an injunction blocking its enforcement against those protected records.

This was far from Benson’s first major legal setback on election procedures.

In 2020, Benson issued guidance directing local clerks to apply a strong presumption in favor of accepting absentee ballot signatures and to look for “any redeeming qualities” when comparing them. Allegan County Clerk Robert Genetski and the Michigan Republican Party sued, arguing the directive amounted to a binding rule that bypassed the required Administrative Procedures Act process. In March 2021, the Michigan Court of Claims agreed and ruled Benson’s signature-matching guidance invalid. The decision came too late to affect the 2020 election, but it marked a clear loss for the Secretary of State in court.

Benson is also facing mounting workplace discrimination claims. Multiple Black employees in her Department of State have filed lawsuits alleging a racially hostile environment, unequal treatment, and retaliation. One former employee received a $775,000 settlement. Additional lawsuits followed in 2026, with reports describing the filings as marking at least the fourth such complaint in recent years.

At the same time, Benson has refused to fully comply with demands from the Trump Justice Department to turn over Michigan’s complete voter rolls so non-citizens can be identified and removed. She provided only a limited public version and has fought broader disclosure in federal court.

Harmeet Dhillon V. Jocelyn Benson

Former Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox is also suing Benson for records related to her past service on the board of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Benson served as a director from 2014 to 2018, a period that overlaps with years in which federal investigators later alleged the organization directed millions of dollars to paid informants associated with extremist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan. Cox and House Republicans have demanded full transparency into her role and any related communications.

Jocelyn Benson is served in SPLC case

The new electronic poll book lawsuit comes as Benson continues to oversee Michigan elections while facing discrimination claims, resisting federal voter-roll requests, and answering questions about her SPLC board service. For a Secretary of State already carrying a record of court losses and unresolved controversies, the latest challenge adds to growing legal and political pressure.

Yet another group is now demanding transparency in Jocelyn Benson’s non-transparent elections and fighting to require proof of citizenship in upcoming elections.

A defiant Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson refuses to remove NON-citizens from Michigan’s voter rolls. Why?

Earlier this month, Americans for Citizens Voting-Michigan held a press conference that included two Michigan lawmakers, including Speaker Pro Temp and Election Integrity Committee Chair Rachelle Smit. The event highlighted a recent video released by James O’Keefe that draws on information provided by Patty McMurray of The Gateway Pundit that exposes an Iranian non-citizen, Afshin Masheli, who served jail time for first-degree sexual assault and appears on the DHS “Worst of the Worst” Criminal Aliens list. Masheli, a non-citizen, has voted three times in Michigan elections. Iran has refused to take him back despite a final removal order.

The purpose of the press conference was to draw attention to the August 24, 2026 meeting of the Michigan Board of State Canvassers, which will decide whether to certify the Citizen Only Voting Amendment for the November 3 ballot. The petition, which gathered more than 700,000 signatures, has already been submitted to the Board of Elections.

On Tuesday, Attorney Kevin Kijewski announced that a Michigan judge sided with the plaintiff. Benson asked the judge to throw the case out. The judge told her “no” on every ground!

Kevin Kijewski posted this recap on X.

THE CASE IN 30 SECONDS:

The electronic poll book is the laptop record of everyone who checked in to vote at your precinct.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s new state rule says clerks must DELETE it 7 days after the election is certified.

Federal law says KEEP it 22 months. Destroying it early is a FEDERAL CRIME.

My client, Bridgewater Township Clerk Michelle McQueer, asked the State which law to follow. ELEVEN MONTHS. NO ANSWER. So she sued.

WHAT HAPPENED TODAY:

– The Court of Claims denied the State’s motion to dismiss. COMPLETELY.

– The State said she waited too long. DENIED. The court: it “cannot fault plaintiff for waiting.” The power to answer her “was completely in their hands.” (pp 19, 21)

– The State said she skipped the process. DENIED. The court: it “will not support defendants delaying in resolving the administrative proceedings and then fault plaintiff for filing suit.” (p 19)

– The State said a clerk can’t bring this case in any court. DENIED. The court: she sued “to ensure that she … complies with state and federal law and therefore will not be criminally charged.” That’s not the kind of case the State’s cases are about. (pp 21-22)

– And the order protecting her records STAYS IN PLACE.

WHAT THE JUDGE WROTE:

The State said criminal liability is “speculative” because DOJ hasn’t prosecuted anyone yet. The judge, in Footnote 3:

“The Court finds this contention to be quite remarkable and reckless.”

And Footnote 5:

“Plaintiff’s suit also could derivatively save the SOS from being criminally charged federally.” READ THAT ONE TWICE. FROM THE HEARING, SEPTEMBER 16: – To the State’s lawyer, first sentence: “Off the top, you lose on the laches.” (p 5)

– When Benson’s lawyer argued the burden on the State: “You’re arguing practicalities. But you know what? I have to comply with the law. I have to follow the law.” (p 11)

– On calling out the State’s specious claim that a clerk can’t bring this case: “I’m with you on that. You’re right.” (p 16)

– The State’s own lawyer, on the record: “You’re not going to hear a merits argument from me.” (p 11)

WHAT’S NEXT:

The State now has to defend the rule on the merits, which it has AVOIDED SINCE THE START. Benson’s lawyers promised in court to issue rulings on her requests within two weeks. Once those land, both sides file, and the judge decides whether a state rule can order clerks to delete what federal law says to keep.

ONE CLERK. TWO LAWS. A JUDGE WHO READS AND CARES ABOUT THE LAW.

Full opinion (Sept22): tinyurl.com/pollbookruling

Hearing transcript (Sept 16): tinyurl.com/pollbooktransc

Let’s make Michigan safe, normal, and responsible again! 

And here is Kevin Kijewski’s announcement on X.

Ad block users: Some site features may not work correctly while an ad blocker is enabled, because they break scripts and content this website depends on. If you can’t see comments below, for example, please disable your ad blocker.



Read the full article here

Share.
Leave A Reply

Exit mobile version