A federal appeals court says it had no choice but to protect the in-home possession of AI-generated child pornography because of a 2002 Supreme Court ruling, even as judges warned that modern technology has blurred the legal lines drawn nearly 25 years ago.
The Washington Post reports that the Seventh Circuit affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of a child pornography possession charge against Steven Anderegg, a Wisconsin man who investigators said had hundreds of AI-generated sexually explicit images depicting children on devices seized from his home.
Anderegg faced four charges: producing and distributing the AI-generated child sexual abuse…
Read the full article at BREITBART.COM
