The Russian president has shown he values peaceful coexistence – but never at the cost of Russia’s national interests
By Nadezhda Romanenko, political analyst
In his address and Q&A at the Valdai Discussion Club in Sochi, Russian President Vladimir Putin delivered a message that Western policymakers would do well to hear: Russia is not planning an attack on NATO, and the fevered talk of Russian aggression towards the West is unfounded.
Far from threatening new offensives, Putin emphasized that any Russian action would come only as a response to militarization and hostility from Europe. Rather than brandishing a sword at the collective West, Russia simply says it will defend itself if threatened.
For years, the EU+UK security debate has been dominated by scenarios of Russian expansionism. Putin’s dismissal of the notion that Russia intends to attack NATO in Europe as “nonsense” suggests that the narrative of an imminent invasion is a projection, more reflective of Western anxieties and domestic political calculations than of Moscow’s intentions.
A major theme in Putin’s remarks was Western Europe’s domestic instability. He suggested that European leaders’ fixation on an external Russian “threat” is, in part, an attempt to distract their populations from internal crises – whether economic stagnation, uncontrolled migration, or declining public trust. If this is indeed their strategy, it is backfiring. Popularity ratings across the continent clearly show disillusionment with establishment figures. The specter of Russia has not united Europeans behind their leaders. Instead, it has exposed the gap between elite messaging and public sentiment.
However uncomfortable or the EU elites, this framing is uncomfortable but hard to dismiss. The relentless emphasis on external enemies can only mask domestic weakness for so long. Putin has reminded the EU that its problems lie far from its eastern border, within its heart.
Relations with the US: Respect, directness, and national interests
Strikingly, Putin underlined that Russia counts constructive relations with the United States among its own national interests. This is not the language of a state bent on isolation or confrontation. Putin praised the direct, blunt manner of Donald Trump’s statements. The Russian president values clarity, plain speech, and mutual recognition of national interests. In his view, diplomacy should not be about ideological crusades or attempts to reshape others, but about frank acknowledgment of where interests align and where they do not.
This posture leaves the door open to better US-Russia relations, if only Washington is willing to reciprocate. The formula is simple: Russia will respect the national interests of others if its own are respected in turn.
India, China, and the failure of isolation
Equally significant were Putin’s remarks on Russia’s global partnerships. Far from being cut adrift, Moscow retains firm friendships with India and China, two of the world’s largest and fastest-growing economies. Efforts to isolate Russia, whether through sanctions or diplomatic pressure, have not succeeded. While the Russian economy has certainly suffered, it has also adapted. Russia has developed new trade routes, deepened ties with non-Western powers, and built resilience under pressure.
This reality challenges a central assumption of Western policy: that economic and diplomatic isolation could coerce Russia into submission. Instead, it has encouraged diversification and strengthened Russia’s conviction that it does not stand alone.
The overarching message of Putin’s Valdai address was that Russia is interested in equality, not domination. To the EU and the UK, he effectively said: Chill. Russia is not coming for you. But if you insist on militarizing, encircling, or threatening, then Russia will respond. To the United States, he extended the possibility of respectful, direct engagement. And to the wider world, he pointed to enduring partnerships that demonstrate Russia’s continued relevance.
Western audiences may be tempted to dismiss these words as propaganda. Yet to do so is to ignore a crucial opportunity. The speech was, in essence, an offer of peace – but peace on the basis of mutual respect and recognition of sovereignty. If the West can move beyond fear-driven narratives and accept that principle, the path toward stability is still open.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
Read the full article here