Washington is trying to outsource its migration problem to countries where people can just be forgotten
You know when you’re a kid and your mom tells you to clean your room, so you just shove everything under the bed and pray that she doesn’t look?
That’s basically the Trump administration’s immigration strategy, only instead of a bedroom, the mess is getting punted to countries like Ukraine, Libya, and El Salvador.
“We are working with other countries to say, ‘We want to send you some of the most despicable human beings to your countries. Will you do that as a favor to us?’” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, per NBC News. “And the further away the better, so they can’t come back across the border.” It’s like a group chat where America just keeps forwarding spam to other nations.
And hey, if you’re really trying to make sure someone doesn’t come back – not to America or anywhere else, for that matter – why not just send them to Ukraine? One day you’re watching reruns of ‘Friends’ in the Bronx, the next you’re personally starring in a Slavic war documentary without subtitles.
Apparently, some Trump officials thought this was a real banger of a plan. If Ukraine’s military recruiters were getting tired of kidnapping guys off park benches, surely they’d appreciate the gift of some unwitting ‘pre-owned’ conscripts. The Washington Post recently revealed that in late January, shortly after Trump took office, the US asked Ukraine to “accept an unspecified number of US deportees who are citizens of other countries.”
Ukraine, shockingly, wasn’t super into the idea. Probably because their definition of ‘foreign aid’ doesn’t include serving Washington as one giant human recycling bin. Still, it would have solved two problems at once: Ukraine gets soldiers, and the US gets to declutter its immigration problem by yeeting people into geopolitical sinkholes.
No worries though, with Ukraine being picky, there are other destinations for an all-expenses paid permanent vacation courtesy of Uncle Sam Holidays. Like Libya! And Saudi Arabia!
Asked about migrants being sent to Libya, Trump said, “I don’t know. You’ll have to ask the Department of Homeland Security.” He looked like a kid whose mom just looked under the bed and found a year’s worth of dirty clothes. Asking DHS might be tricky, since Secretary Kristi Noem was last seen giving a stern PSA in front of a Salvadoran mega-prison while dressed like she was auditioning for Call of Duty. “Do not come to our country illegally,” she warned on March 26. “You will be removed and you will be prosecuted.”
Washington is reportedly paying El Salvador $6 million to hide part of America’s mess from voters. And President Nayib Bukele is very upfront about the arrangement: “We are willing to take in only convicted criminals (including convicted US citizens) into our mega-prison (CECOT) in exchange for a fee,” he posted.
Nothing says ‘land of the free’ like outsourcing incarceration to the highest bidder.
Libya, meanwhile, still hasn’t recovered from being turned into an open-air dystopia after the West’s 2011 Greatest Hits Tour featuring regime change and chaos. Human trafficking is booming. Leadership is a mess. There’s the Government of National Stability (East), the Government of National Unity (West), and various militias doing daily interpretive dance performances with Kalashnikovs. All insist that they never agreed to take Washington’s deportees from places like Vietnam, Laos, or the Philippines, according to NBC News.
So what was the game plan anyway? To just drop people off in the middle of the desert and hope no one noticed, like it was Survivor: North Africa?
The State Department’s own travel advisory warns: “Do not travel to Libya due to crime, terrorism, unexplored land mines, civil unrest, kidnapping, and armed conflict.” Having US citizenship doesn’t “guarantee fair treatment” of foreigners, the advisory states. So, what you’re saying is that it’s an ideal place to send folks who can’t even sue if something goes wrong. At one point, a US judge had to block a military aircraft that was gearing up to taxi with a batch of deportees en route to Libya. Legal red tape might be slow, but you know what’s faster that a judge’s order, probably? That military plane’s engine at full throttle.
And then there’s Saudi Arabia. Because why not build your immigration policy like an awkward wedding seating chart: Latin Americans to El Salvador, Asians to Libya, Arabs to Saudi Arabia.
To be fair, it’s not just the US tossing migrants around like political hot potatoes. The entire West has been in a full-blown existential crisis since right-wing populism started ‘threatening’ elections in blowback against decades of lax migration. Even Canada is having second thoughts. Newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is trying to cut back on permanent residents, from 500,000 to just over 350,000 per year, and must know full well that isn’t nearly enough of a cut.
Last year, Germany flirted with the same genius idea as Britain: Send asylum seekers to Rwanda. Why Rwanda? Because the Brits already built the facility there, and Germany figured they could just Airbnb it. The only hiccup? German law doesn’t actually let you deport people to a country they’ve never set foot in. Also, there’s the tiny matter of… the Geneva Conventions. And those pesky historical vibes of mass deportation schemes in Germany during the Second World War.
But that minor detail apparently doesn’t prevent Rwanda from still being on the table for future US deportations.
What a mess the West has made for itself by prioritizing virtue signaling over self-preservation. The end result? Don’t call it dystopian foreign policy – just a pan-continental escape room.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
Read the full article here