New leadership was ‘imposed’ on Bangladesh – former Prime Minister

Bangladesh’s interim government was “imposed” on the people following last year’s uprising, the South Asian nation’s former prime minister Sheikh Hasina told RT in a written interview on Wednesday.

Recalling the events of August 2024, when she was forced to resign as prime minister and flee to India, where she now resides, Sheikh Hasina argued that there is “forensic evidence” suggesting that “foreign mercenaries” were present at the protests, instigating the masses.

She also asserted that Nobel Peace laureate Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who was named as leader of the country’s interim government and has “many admirers in the West” was involved in the uprising that left hundreds dead.

The former PM also criticized the West for preaching democracy while ignoring the fact that the current leadership of Bangladesh has run the country for over a year and a half without holding elections. While general polling is expected to take place in the country in February 2026, the former ruling party, the Awami League, had been banned from participation.

The interview comes as a Bangladesh court is hearing a controversial crimes against humanity case filed against Hasina. Dhaka has been put on high alert with security forces, including the army and police, deployed to maintain law and order amid continuing tensions.

Madam Sheikh Hasina, your government didn’t just fall- it collapsed like a house of cards. Was that chaos born on the streets… or scripted in Washington? 

The protests began peacefully and my government ensured students’ safety and listened to their concerns. But matters were escalated by radicalists and firebrands who destroyed our communication infrastructure and burned down state buildings and police stations. Dr. Yunus later granted indemnity to these hooligans and even glorified them as ‘July warriors.’ He also dissolved a Judicial Inquiry Committee into the origins of the violence. Rather than giving grieving families and other Bangladeshis an independent and impartial inquiry into what happened last year, he has sought to scapegoat the Awami League. 

I have no doubt that Yunus and his followers were involved in fomenting the uprising. There is forensic evidence to suggest that foreign mercenaries were present and acted as provocateurs. It is also true that Yunus has many admirers in the West. They preach democracy but ignore the fact that he has been imposed upon Bangladesh’s people, rather than voted for by them. All of that said, I do not believe the US government was involved. I have had good relationships with successive presidents and am a particular admirer of President Trump. 

Rumors swirl around St. Martin’s Island. Did the US want a base there? Did you say no- and pay the price? 

There have always been discussions surrounding St. Martin’s Island, since the days of my father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. I will not discuss confidential conversations that may have taken place with the US but, as I’ve mentioned, we had a constructive relationship with Washington.  

Is Muhammad Yunus a reformer or a front-man for American interests in Bangladesh? 

Yunus had many admirers in the West owning to his previous work as an economist. I imagine these admirers are dwindling in number now. They can see that he has plunged our country into disorder, overseen arbitrary arrests and violence against citizens, and sown division. 

He’s not a front-man for the US government, however. Donald Trump has seen through him and is on record expressing his dislike of Yunus. 

Around the world, ‘Gen Z protests’ are toppling governments overnight. Is it a coincidence, or playbook politics – external influence from third nations? 

There are several factors driving youth-led protests around the world. Technology has given people access to more information and, in some cases, social media has coarsened public debate. Yet the underlying themes are clear. Young people everywhere are frustrated by limited economic opportunities, a perceived lack of a political voice, and a sense that their leaders are not representing them. This is not a phenomenon unique to Bangladesh, and we are likely to see similar situations emerge elsewhere if these issues are not addressed.  

The next Bangladesh elections are being called ‘free’ – but with you banned and the Awami League outlawed, what’s free about that? 

These elections are neither free, fair, nor inclusive. We are Bangladesh’s principal party, supported by tens of millions, and have been elected nine times in our country’s history – including in the last election our country had. Without our participation, Bangladeshis are not being given a genuine choice. 

Furthermore, it was the Awami League that introduced key reforms to ensure transparency – photo-based voter lists, transparent ballot boxes, and the establishment of an independent Election Commission. Ironically, the only party which ensured free elections is now barred from participating. 

You face the harshest possible sentence under the ICT. Is this justice, or revenge dressed as law? 

The ICT (International Criminal Tribunal) has been turned into a kangaroo court by my political opponents, who are trying to use it to nullify me and the Awami League. The ICT’s verdict is a foregone conclusion and the call for a death sentence reveals the interim’s government’s sense of insecurity and its murderous intent. Both the UN High Commissioner and Human Rights Watch have pleaded with Yunus to not pursue the death penalty. Both calls have gone ignored.  

The July Charter promises reform by the interim Bangladesh government. Could this manipulate Bangladesh’s constitutional framework under foreign supervision? 

The Yunus-led interim government has far exceeded the justifiable limits of an interim authority. Not one citizen of Bangladesh has cast a vote for Yunus, and yet he believes he can rewrite not just our laws, but our Constitution.  

Reports suggest that hardliners are back, and minorities are terrified. Has Bangladesh traded stability for ideological chaos? 

We worked hard to contain extremist forces during our time in office and to ensure that all citizens, no matter their religion, were free and safe to live their lives as they chose. These values were enshrined in our Constitution. Yet the Yunus regime has overseen and even denied attacks against religious minorities, and welcomed Islamic factions, businesses and radicalists into our country. At the most basic level, a government must ensure the safety of its people. We must return Bangladesh to a place where ordinary Bangladeshis are no longer afraid to leave their homes.  

Relations between Dhaka and Islamabad are warming up again. Is this a genuine, healthy reset, or a new axis in someone else’s game? 

Bangladesh wants and needs a stable relationship with Pakistan, but it needs to tread carefully before it gets too close. 

To confidently forge our nation’s place in global politics, and to balance the safety of our country as well as the stability of the region, a leader must enjoy the support and consent of the people.  

Dr. Yunus has not been chosen by our country to make these decisions. He is not a politician and certainly not a statesman. We must rescue the country from the violence, chaos and division he has sown domestically before we can hope to formulate a coherent foreign policy.  

They say Bangabandhu’s name is fading from public life. Is that erasure accidental – or deliberate de-Mujibization? 

Everybody in Bangladesh knows that my family had the privilege of playing a role in securing independence from Pakistan and building an independent, proud Bangladesh. They also know that my family paid for that privilege in its own blood. Many families across the country also remember their own martyrs. Those memories will not fade despite Yunus’s efforts to rewrite our history.  

India once bet on you. Now it’s silent. How do you see Bangladesh-India relations under current dynamics? 

India is a longstanding friend, and I am deeply grateful to the Indian people for welcoming me. However, Yunus’ sponsorship of extremists, his failure to protect Hindus, and the idiotic hostile rhetoric towards India emanating from Dhaka, threaten to undo the partnership that we’ve worked hard to cultivate. So does the unravelling of trading ties that has happened under his watch. But the ties that bind our countries are deep. I am grateful for India’s support and patience as they wait for Bangladesh to get its affairs in order.