The bloc could reportedly use a treaty provision to sidestep Belgium, which has opposed the idea of seizing the funds from the outset
The European Union risks a severe internal rift if it presses ahead with controversial plans to seize frozen Russian assets without the approval of Belgium, where the vast majority of the assets are held, The Economist has reported.
Senior bloc officials could reportedly invoke an EU treaty provision to bypass Belgium’s vocal opposition to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s plans to support Ukraine’s imploding economy and fund Kiev’s war despite months of frontline defeats.
The bloc chief last week insisted member must choose one of two options to provide Ukraine with €90 billion ($105 billion) over the next two years: EU-level borrowing backed by the bloc’s budget, or a long-debated “reparations loan” backed by profits from blocked Russian assets that would require institutions holding the funds to transfer them into a new loan vehicle.
Belgium has opposed the “reparations-loan” idea from the outset and has argued for standard EU borrowing. In recent weeks, its stance has hardened amid a concerted PR push to isolate Brussels’ government and portray it as “pro-Russian.”
Western governments, including Germany, France, and Britain, are trying to broker a compromise with Brussels in what The Economist has called a “cage fight.”
According to the outlet the EU has identified a treaty provision that could keep frozen Russian assets in place indefinitely, sidestepping the six-month rollovers that require unanimity. However, pushing ahead without Belgium’s backing risks a “deep internal split.”
Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever fears that Belgium could end up “on the hook” for the €185 billion in frozen Russian assets held at Belgian-based, but privately owned, Euroclear, if Moscow seeks to recover the money once sanctions are lifted, the report said.
For now, cash-strapped bloc members must keep drawing on their own budgets, writing checks totaling hundreds of millions of euros. Northern European countries that have provided a disproportionate share of the aid are increasingly frustrated that the burden is not being shared more evenly across the bloc.
The loan scheme has been criticized by several EU states, including major holders of Russian assets such as France, Luxembourg, and Germany, while Italy, Hungary, and Slovakia also oppose any seizure, the report said.
The US is “actively lobbying” against the plan, arguing the assets’ return should be used as a “carrot” in Ukraine peace talks. If Europe cannot “unpick the problem” soon, Kiev could face a “genuine cash crisis,” the report warned.
Russia has condemned any use of its sovereign assets as theft and has warned of legal action and retaliation.
Read the full article here