WATCH: Mike Waltz Buries Dana Bash After She Whines and Tries to Shame Him Over President Trump Banning CNN from the White House

CNN hack Dana Bash was left red-faced on her network today as United Nations Ambassador Mike Waltz took her to school with a few history lessons that justify President Trump’s media ban.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, President Trump on Friday announced on Truth Social that he had banned CNN, MSNOW, and Politico from the White House for constantly reporting “FAKE NEWS.”

Trump later followed through on his promise. Reporters at the three outlets were left stunned when they attempted to enter the White House grounds, only to find that their press passes did not work (the passes were also confiscated).

Bash questioned and tried to shame him over the ban, even comparing Trump’s actions to those of Communist China.

Waltz responded by pointing out that the Biden regime actively barred several conservative outlets from entering the White House grounds, but no one at CNN said a word.

He then went on to slam the corporate media’s corrupt journalism in which they report fake news to go viral, but then issue a weak correction that no one sees.

Finally, Waltz said that Supreme Court cases show that while media organizations have a right to cover the White House, they are not entitled to be inside the facility itself.

After Waltz was done, Bash said she was at a “loss for words.”

WATCH:

🚨 HOLY CRAP! UN Ambassador Mike Waltz just RAN OVER CNN to their face whining about President Trump removing Fake News from the White House

BASH: “I’m at a loss for words!”

WALTZ: “There’s a BIG DIFFERENCE between negative reporting and GARBAGE, GOSSIP JOURNALISM!” 🔥

“The… pic.twitter.com/29QThRdCnG

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) September 20, 2026

WALTZ: The prior administration limited all kinds of journalistic outfits and journalists they had deemed right-wing. Those have now been allowed onto the facility, and the president doesn’t believe others are acting in good faith.

I just saw one using anonymous sources referencing someone who’s dead. Take a good, introspective look at itself and its practices. It throws things out there, then puts a little baby correction nobody pays attention to, and it sticks to people like napalm.

The Supreme Court has been very clear in multiple cases going back to the 1960s (regarding) your right to publish and speak rather than having access to any government facility.

BASH: I’m just at a loss for words, especially when the president decides he just doesn’t want negative reporting.