Norm Eisen, the godfather of the color revolution and unhinged Trump-hater, went on with CNN this morning to argue how we (Democrats) need their mail-in votes in November.
When Democrats freak out about losing unlimited mail-in ballots from illegal voters or made-up names, they are telling you something you already know.
Democrats can’t win without their fake voters.
And, it appears, if these numbers are correct that Democrats depend on these phantom voters to win elections.
This explains everything…
Look at 2020.
Flu cases confirmed by the CDC:
2012: 34 million
2016: 29 million
2020: 1.8 million
2024: 40 millionMail in ballots in POTUS Elections:
2012: 27 million
2016: 33 million
2020: 70 million
2024: 49 millionIt was an operation.
— C3 (@C_3C_3) August 11, 2026
Eisen knows where the votes are coming from. It’s not a secret.
In 2020 (via Grok)-
2020 presidential election (COVID-era peak)
- Pew: 58% of Biden voters used mail/absentee ballots.
- MIT: 60% of Democratic voters. Republicans were around 32%.
In 2024:
- MIT Election Lab (“How We Voted in 2024”): 37% of Democratic voters used mail ballots (down from 60% in 2020). Republicans: 24%.
- Pew Research Center: 44% of Democratic voters reported voting by mail or absentee (Republicans: 26%). A similar Pew analysis of Harris voters put the figure at 43%.
On Thursday, Norm Eisen posted his CNN appearance where he explained why the country (Democrats) needs mail-in voting.
It basically comes down to: The postal service is so inept it can’t deliver my utility bills on time, therefore we should make sure they handle millions of unlimited mail-in votes in the 2026 midterm
Norm Eisen: No mail-in voting is currently being affected by this rule. It’s grossly unconstitutional, and we and others have gone to court to stop it. We will stop it. And voters should know that this idea that the Postal Service is going to screen every mail-in voter and mail-in ballot in the country is not going to happen.
Phil! They can’t even deliver my utility bill on time. They cannot turn into a kind of super registrar for every voter in the land, and most importantly, it’s profoundly against the Constitution. The courts are going to stop it.
Via Andrew Wilkow:
I had to watch this twice. His argument is the post office is so inefficient that it can’t be expected to track every ballot. At the same time the USPS should oversee unlimited mail in ballots. https://t.co/dZs39CemuU
— Andrew Wilkow (@WilkowMajority) August 28, 2026
Ad block users: Some site features may not work correctly while an ad blocker is enabled, because they break scripts and content this website depends on. If you can’t see comments below, for example, please disable your ad blocker.
Read the full article here