Spearheaded by Saudi Arabia, most regional powers seek to avoid a devastating new conflict once the US-Israeli war on Tehran ends, the report says
Saudi Arabia has floated the idea of a landmark non-aggression pact between the Gulf states and Iran after the end of the US-Israeli war on Tehran, the Financial Times reported on Friday, citing diplomatic sources.
Western diplomats told the newspaper that Riyadh is studying a model loosely inspired by the Helsinki Process, the Cold War-era talks that produced the 1975 Helsinki Accords on security and European cooperation, and succeeded in defusing tensions between the Soviet Union and Western nations led by the US.
The idea is reportedly being weighed as Gulf states fear that Iran – outraged by the devastating US-Israeli strikes but still a potent military power – will remain dangerous, especially if the US agrees to reduce its large regional footprint after the end of the war.
According to the FT, the idea of an all-encompassing non-aggression pact was being floated before the US-Israeli attack, but the war gave it additional urgency.
An unnamed Arab diplomat told the newspaper that most Arab and Muslim states, as well as Iran – which has long insisted that the US should leave the region – would probably welcome a Helsinki-style pact, but warned that Israel remains the elephant in the room.
“In the current climate, you are not going to be able to get Iran and Israel… without Israel it could be counter-productive because after Iran, they are seen as the biggest source of conflict,” the diplomat told the FT. “But Iran is not going anywhere and this is why the Saudis are pushing it.”
European nations – which were reluctant to support the war against Iran and seek stability in the Strait of Hormuz – have reportedly backed the Saudi idea and urged other Gulf governments to support it, seeing it as a way to reduce the risk of another war while giving Tehran assurances that it will not be attacked.
Prior to the war, Gulf states lobbied the US against launching a full-scale attack against Iran to avoid retaliation, according to media reports. When their efforts failed, they condemned the Iranian strikes, with Saudi Arabia and the UAE reportedly independently striking targets in Iran. Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE host US military bases, which Iran views as legitimate targets.
While many Arab countries would welcome a deal, they are not united, with Saudi Arabia and the UAE sparring over regional influence, the FT said. The UAE has also been the most hawkish Gulf state toward Iran during the war, while signaling the intention to forge closer ties with Israel. Two of the sources told the FT that it is doubtful the UAE will sign a non-aggression pact.
Iran’s relations with the Gulf states are equally uneven. Tehran enjoys the warmest ties with Oman, which has acted as a key mediator in US-Iran talks. It also maintains pragmatic economic ties with Qatar as the two countries share the South Pars-North Field gas deposit. As for Kuwait, the two countries have treated each other with caution.
Saudi Arabia remains Iran’s main rival in the Gulf, though the two restored relations in 2023. Iran and the UAE maintain trade ties, though relations are strained due to the war and territorial disputes. Bahrain has the most tense relationship with Tehran due to sectarian politics, accusations of Iranian interference in internal affairs, and Bahrain’s close ties with the US, though the sides agreed to a limited detente before the war.
Read the full article here