A Missouri pharmacist suspects the Biden autopen signature is bigger than already reported.
On February 20, 2021 a Missouri pharmacist reached out to The Gateway Pundit and shared his observations on Biden’s signature to date. (This was only a few weeks after Biden stepped into the White House and no doubt one of the first observations on Joe Biden’s signature on official documents.)
This pharmacist noted:
I am a pharmacist in Missouri. I read a few days ago that none of Biden’s Executive Orders have been posted to the Federal Register, so I looked, then, a few days ago. Those Executive Orders are showing up. However, I believe I have accidentally discovered his signature may be a forgery. I just sat on this discovery, thinking someone else more important would notice it. I guess no one has yet.
Part of my job as a pharmacist is to watch for forged doctor signatures and I am pretty sure Joe’s are forged. I suspect that he is embarrassed by his shaky signature and had his wife sign for his signature stamp used for official business. As you can see on the attachment the last three signatures are identical, indicative of a stamp, and that’s fine as long as it is his signature. Maybe that’s easier to submit to the Federal Register. Otherwise, I believe it is illegal to have someone else sign for a signature stamp that binds a legal document. I have seen the signature of doctors get shaky at the end of their careers, but never change in a single year as Joe’s purportedly has done.
If you have contact with a handwriting expert, perhaps you can have that person take a look. But look at the attachment I created, all from the public domain. Clearly, Joe has an established signature, but the last three signatures I have on the document are from separate Executive Orders that can be found online at the Federal Register. Clearly, in my opinion, they are not his signature. They look more like the signature of his wife, Jill, also on the attachment. Focus on the “B” in Biden. Perhaps an expert can offer a more definitive opinion.
This same pharmacist shared some more information regarding Biden’s signature on June 28, 2025, which is shocking. See highlighted comments below:
I am a retired pharmacist/drug store owner and have spent more than 50 years reviewing handwritten prescriptions in part to insure there are no fraudulent doctor signatures. Now, most prescriptions are digital and the signatures are also digital, but I still gained the ability to recognize authentic, live signatures during my career as a pharmacist. I first noticed the Joe Biden signature at the Federal Register was likely fraudulent in early 2021. I was watching for the first ones to be submitted because I doubted whether or not he was coherent even then. So I did a little research and I concluded Joe Biden has always had a distinctive signature and none of those signed with Autopen are his true signature, I am certain of it.
As background, I have watched doctor signatures progress/digress as they age for many years. In a small town I could recognize the signatures of the doctors and also individual nurse’s working on behalf of doctors. I could tell who specifically signed the prescription, be it the doctor or specific nurse. It’s not uncommon for signatures to change, but usually it is just a matter of getting a little shaky as people age. However, the signatures don’t change in a wholesale manner then revert back at some point, even with dementia, as Biden’s purportedly did. Some doctors develop dementia as well.
I think Jill Biden signed at least one or more of the signatures for the Autopen. You can look at the [TGP] article from 2021 and see her signature along with Joe’s. It appears she stepped in for Joe for some reason and signed for the Autopen. Maybe his signature was shaky, I don’t know, but the Autopen signatures are not his. Concentrate on the “B” in Biden. Joe draws a line then makes more or less a 3 for the rest of the B. Jill starts at the bottom then goes up and makes a small loop at the top and a larger loop below for her B. That “B” is what is on the Autopen signatures. Even the straight line in the “J” for Joe is different from Joe’s established signature as opposed to the Autopen signature. You will see it if you look.
From what I can see, there were 3 separate signatures used with the Joe Biden Autopen during his tenure, but again, none were his established signature. However, the live signature on Joe’s resignation letter on July 21, 2024, when he dropped out of the campaign, is authentic in my opinion. So is his signature on his pardon for Hunter Biden, even though he was shaky with that one and messed up his B, but it is still consistent with his established signature, not Jill’s.
If you will study the information I sent to The Gateway Pundit back in January 2021, [see the link above] you will see what I am talking about.
The concise point here is: it appears Joe Biden had a consistent signature before he was President, then different ones during his presidency, and then reverted back to his original signature when he resigned and signed Hunter’s pardon. That never happens in my experience.
Facsimile laws do not allow for a forged signature to bind a legal document. That is the issue here and while the Autopen alone is a big thing and worth prying into insofar as who was controlling it, the larger issue is it was never legitimate with the signature of Joe Biden, but a forgery.
I know everyone is busy. But if you think about it, a forgery is much worse than a fuzzy authorization for use of the Autopen. The two combined are devastating. I hope you see the distinction. Again, I suggest an established signature expert look at it.
“When I first contacted Jim in 2021, I thought maybe I could head off a Constitutional crisis; now I think there is one.”
This weekend this expert shared the following:
I have searched exhaustively and can find no instance of Joe Biden signing his signature as it appears on the Autopen. But the Autopen “B” in Biden is consistent with how Jill Biden signs her signature. Joe draws a line starting at the top and adds basically a 3 to make his B. Jill Biden starts and the bottom a goes up to make two loops, a smaller one at the top and larger at the bottom, all in a single continuous line, for her B just as with the Autopen signature. A forgery nullifies the Autopen according to facsimile signature laws I have studied as does unauthorized use.
The problem with only going after the unauthorized use with the Autopen signature for pardons is there is precedence for a President to make an oral pardon. Abraham Lincoln did it. Joe could say he verbally approved the pardons if someone tells him to say that. But that can’t be done on matters requiring a valid signature, such as Presidential approval of laws. That’s why the probable forgery is huge.
As a reminder, the only two signatures during the Biden presidency that look legitimate to me are his resignation letter during the campaign and then upon his pardon of Hunter Biden. Again, people just don’t switch back and forth from their established signatures like Joe purportedly did. I’ve never seen it and have spent a lifetime looking at signatures in my work as a pharmacist.
It appears no one really cares or understands about the forgery of the Autopen signature. I think it must be too big for anyone to want to tackle.
This is huge.
Read the full article here