EU’s Digital Markets Act Demands That Apple Agree To Its Own Demise

Apple has to keep getting the future right. It’s that simple. The present of business is the past, which means an inability to consistently see what’s ahead is the path to decline. This persistent, ruthless truth rates prominent mention as the EU foists the Digital Market Act (DMA) on Apple.

Precisely because Apple is on top, CEO Tim Cook and his team are under relentless pressure not to merely meet the needs of present and future customers, but lead them. The latter is a necessary pre-condition of commercial success, but also a reminder of the ephemeral quality of it. Particularly in consumer technology. Since the profits for the winners in this space are so immense, the challenges associated with remaining a winner are intensely grueling.

Imagine having to continually see around the proverbial corner in pursuit of what’s next so that buyers will be eager to purchase what’s next. In a sports sense it’s the equivalent of picking not this year’s World Series winner, but the one five or ten years from now.

It’s something to keep in mind as the EU continues to harass Apple with demands that it make Apple products more compatible and operable with products of other companies, including rivals. Stop and think about the superfluity, along with the impossibility of such demands. Let’s start with their superfluous nature.

Exactly because Apple is working feverishly to anticipate and lead the needs of arguably the world’s most discerning customer base, no force is required for it to work closely with others. As evidenced by the myriad non-Apple products and services that can already be found on Apple products, Apple is very much in the business of scanning the wide array of known and unknown innovators out there with an eye on working alongside them in order to create the ultimate user experience for existing and would-be customers. Really, what choice does it have?

In asking the question, it’s useful for readers to pick up their iPhone, iPad, or much more useful, for them to take a look at their smartphones and computers that aren’t made by Apple. To do so is to see that stasis is the path to commoditization. What’s hot today is routinely behind the times tomorrow as competitors commoditize what used to be sui generis.

Which is once again a sign that Apple doesn’t need the DMA to avail itself of the many great advances taking place outside of Apple, and that are being created by competitors or would-be competitors. A desire to maintain its perch at the top means that if there’s someone out there worth it for Apple to work with, the DMA won’t be the instigator.

Which brings us to the impossible aspect of the DMA. Implicit in the law is that there are some rivals and would-be partners that Apple is not eagerly trying to work with. Well, yes. A blinding glimpse of the obvious yes. Apple is discerning about those it works with, by necessity. See above. Apple is toiling tirelessly to avoid the commoditization that would end its reign at the top of the technology pyramid.

It’s really that simple. For Apple to pursue compatibility or operability with all who want to be associated with Apple based on EU force would be for Apple to agree to its own rather rapid demise. No thanks.