A member of the Tim Walz administration keyed several Tesla vehicles and caused upwards of $20,000. The Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty let him walk.
Now a young woman with no criminal record has been accused of keying her co-worker’s car and she apparently will be charged.
Is there a better example of selective justice? Why does the Tim Walz associate get a free pass, but the young woman with no political connections gets charged?
WOW: A 19-year-old Hennepin County woman is charged with a felony for $7K in damages after keying a coworker’s car.
But Soros-backed Mary Moriarty let this Democrat activist walk free after $20K in vandalism to Teslas in Hennepin County.
Two-tier justice, plain and simple. pic.twitter.com/5vI4giVR5F
— Dustin Grage (@GrageDustin) April 24, 2025
The Mankato Free Press reported:
But one case is striking for the argument Moriarty has made around Adams being a first-time offender.
A 19-year-old Robbinsdale woman with no criminal record was charged with first-degree felony property damage on Monday after she allegedly keyed her coworker’s car at the White Castle in Brooklyn Park. The damage to the car was estimated at $7,000. She is due to make her first court appearance in two weeks.
When asked how she could balance that charging decision with the decision to not charge Adams, Moriarty didn’t directly respond. She said her office’s main goal is to hold the person accountable for keying the car, get restitution to the people affected, and avoid felony convictions when possible, because it can waylay someone’s life. She said all of that will happen in Adams’ case, and if he fails to complete the diversion program criminal charges will be filed.
‘Should we have treated this gentleman differently because it’s a political issue?’ Moriarty asked. ‘We made this decision because it is in the best interest of public safety.’
The message being sent here is loud and clear.
Two-tier justice in full swing, Democrat activists get a free pass while others face harsh penalties.
— Barefoot Pregnant (@usuallypregnant) April 24, 2025
This is actually selective prosecution and against the law. The woman’s attorney needs to file for a dismissal based on selective prosecution. There was a Federal case a few years back in Southern California where a federal judge dismissed a case against conservatives who were… https://t.co/Ngf6TMqIL0
— Holly Galloway (@holloway923) April 24, 2025
Do people who work in Democrat politics have more rights than other people? Is that really the message they want to send here?
Read the full article here